USPTO serial 79288514
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberto Ledesma
Roberto Ledesma Law Office of Roberto LedesmaP.O. Box 230692New York, NY 10023UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Data processing apparatus; computer programs, recorded for enterprise asset and performance management and analytics; computer operating programs, recorded; computer software, recorded for enterprise asset and performance management and analytics; interfaces for computers; monitors being recorded and downloadable computer programs for enterprise asset and performance management and analytics; computer programs, downloadable for enterprise asset and performance management and analytics; computer software applications, downloadable for enterprise asset and performance management and analytics; computer software platforms, recorded and downloadable for application development, web hosting, database management | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technological research in the field of enterprise asset and performance management and analytics; conducting technical project studies, namely, conducting design and development of new technologies; engineering; computer programming; computer software design; updating of computer software; maintenance of computer software; computer system analysis; computer system design; duplication of computer programs; conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; creating and maintaining web sites for others; hosting computer sites being Web sites; installation of computer software; conversion of computer programs and data, other than physical conversion; computer software consultancy; digitization of documents; monitoring of computer systems by remote access to ensure proper functioning; software as a service (SAAS) featuring software for enterprise asset and performance management and analytics; information technology (IT) consultancy; server hosting; providing information on computer technology and programming via a web site; cloud computing, namely, conducting design and development of new technologies; outsource service providers in the field of information technology; technological consultancy, namely, conducting design and development of new technologies; computer technology consultancy; telecommunications technology consultancy; computer security consultancy; technical writing; monitoring of computer systems to detect breakdowns; Internet security consultancy; data security consultancy; data encryption services; monitoring of computer systems for detecting unauthorized access or data breach; electronic monitoring of personally identifying information to detect identity theft via the Internet; software development in the framework of software publishing; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in enterprise asset and performance management and analytics; development of computer platforms | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 8, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 8, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 29, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 13, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 20, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 25, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 15, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |