Drawing for RAPIDGAN

USPTO serial 79288567

RAPIDGAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MACFARLANE, JAMES W
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with RAPIDGAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Usb chargers for electronic devices that are used for heating tobacco; universal serial bus [usb] hardware; usb adapters; usb chargers; usb hardware; electric power supply units; high-frequency switching power supplies; electrical plugs and sockets; multi-outlet socket blocks; electronic docking stations; electronic docking stations; electronic display units; ac/dc power supplies; battery chargers; battery charge devices; battery chargers for mobile phones; battery chargers for laptop computers; battery chargers for electronic cigarettes; battery chargers for tablet computers; battery chargers for use with telephones; battery charging devices for motor vehicles; battery charge devices; battery chargers for cellular phones; mains chargers; battery jump starters; cell phone battery chargers; cell phone battery chargers for use in vehicles; chargers; chargers for batteries; chargers for electric accumulators; chargers for electric batteries; chargers for electrical accumulators; chargers for electronic cigarettes; battery chargers for electronic cigarettes; chargers for mobile phones; chargers for electric batteries; electronic cigarette chargers; charging appliances for rechargeable equipment; charging trolleys for tablets and laptops; dc input power supplies; chargers for electric accumulators; flyback transformers; mains chargers; mobile phone battery chargers; chargers for electric toothbrushes; batteries for mobile phones; electric power supplies for electronic cigarettes; wireless charging pads for smartphones; uninterruptible electrical power supplies; wireless chargers; wireless charging pads for smartphonesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2022FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 14, 2022FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 14, 2022FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 25, 2021OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 8, 2021OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 8, 2021OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 14, 2021MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 14, 2021ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 18, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 25, 2020RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2020RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 22, 2020RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 21, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 10, 2020MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 6, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 2, 2020REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance