Drawing for SUNFLOWER LANYARD SCHEME

USPTO serial 79288834

SUNFLOWER LANYARD SCHEME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SUNFLOWER LANYARD SCHEME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas R. Wolf

Douglas R. Wolf Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.600 ATLANTIC AVENUEBOSTON, MA 02210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
026Lanyards [cords] for wear (in the opinion of the International Bureau, the specified terms are too vague for the purposes of classification - Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Common Regulations); lanyards for wear (in the opinion of the International Bureau, the specified terms are too vague for the purposes of classification - Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Common Regulations)ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 2, 2026ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 12, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 1, 2026ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 6, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 26, 2022FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 4, 2022FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 4, 2022FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 25, 2021OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 8, 2021OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 8, 2021OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 4, 2021MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 4, 2021ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 12, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 21, 2020RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 21, 2020RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 5, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2020ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Aug 5, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 5, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2020RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 14, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2020MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 7, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 2, 2020REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance