USPTO serial 79288968
LIANSU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTINS, ODETTE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIANSU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Plastic pipe cutting machine; plastic lead lettering machine in the nature of industrial printing machines; grinding machines for the treatment of gum; plastic processing machines; injection plastic molding machines; cutting machine; machine for manufacturing electrical wire; embossing machines; disintegrators; shaft couplings as parts of machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Pipe muffs, not of metal; sealant compounds for joints; insulating materials; plastic substances, semi-processed in the nature of tubes, bars; padding materials of rubber or plastics; adhesive bands other than stationery and not for medical or household purposes; reinforcing materials, not of metal for pipes; plastic substances, semi-processed; junctions, not of metal, for pipes; flexible tubes, not of metal; plastic film, not for wrapping | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Floor tiles, not of metal; water pipe, not of metal; gutter pipes, not of metal; building panel, not of metal; water-pipe valves, not of metal or plastic; building materials, not of metal, namely, marble; transportable buildings, not of metal; drain pipes, not of metal; facings, not of metal, for building, namely, non-metal facing sheets of plywood, plaster facing for building | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2021 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 30, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 29, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2020 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2020 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |