USPTO serial 79289017
Serial No. 79289017
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 79289017?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software recorded; couplers [data processing equipment]; laptop computers; data processing apparatus; computer hardware; humanoid robots with artificial intelligence; smartglasses; smartwatches; telecommunication apparatus in the form of jewellery; facial recognition apparatus; wearable activity trackers; computer programs, recorded; loudspeakers; television apparatus; earphone; virtual reality headsets; wearable video display monitors; set-top boxes; camcorders; smartphones; tablet computers; video screens; computer servers; network communication equipment; batteries electric; integrated circuits; graphics processor units (GPUs); central processing units [processors]; chips [integrated circuits]; vehicle radios; electronic navigational and positioning apparatus and instruments | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Message sending; providing internet chatrooms; providing user access to global computer networks; providing access to databases; transmission of digital files; streaming of data; radio broadcasting; teleconferencing services; communications by cellular phones; webcasting services; videoconferencing services; video-on-demand transmission; computer aided transmission of messages and images; broadcasting of programs by internet; transmission of sound and images by satellite | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing information relating to computer technology and programming via a web site; software as a service [SaaS]; cloud computing; platform as a service [PaaS]; updating and maintenance of computer software; research and development services relating to computer software; design and development of computer software; electronic data storage; quality system certification; technical research; telecommunications technology consultancy; product quality testing services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2021 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 12, 2021 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 4, 2020 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 16, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |