Drawing for VRG GRL

USPTO serial 79289446

VRG GRL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CIANCI, RYAN MICHAEL
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VRG GRL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Shamus T. O'Doherty

Shamus T. O'Doherty Randall Danskin PS601 West RiversideSuite 1500Spokane, WA 99201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Eyeglasses; eyewear; fashion spectacles; spectacles; sunglasses; eye glass casesACTIVE—
014bracelets as jewellery; brooches being jewellery; jewellery chains; charms for jewellery; costume jewellery; custom jewellery; hat jewellery; jewellery; jewellery articles; jewellery charms; jewellery findings; jewellery for personal wear; jewellery watches; lockets as jewellery; neck chains; necklaces as jewellery; pendants as jewellery; personal jewellery; precious jewellery; rings as jewellery; shoe jewellery; sterling silver jewelleryACTIVE—
018Airline travel bags; athletics bags; kit bags; bags made of imitation leather; bags made of leather; beach bags; all purpose carrying bags; clutch bags; cosmetic bags sold empty; duffle bags; evening bags; gym bags; jewellery bags of textile material sold empty; leather bags; make-up bags sold empty; messenger bags; overnight bags; textile shopping bags; shoulder bags; sling bags; toiletry bags sold empty; tote bags; travel bags; travelling bags; weekend bags; wristlet bags; card holders in the form of wallets; change purses; clutch purses; coin purses; evening purses; handbags; handbags made of imitation leather; handbags made of leather; ladies' handbags; leather purses; leather wallets; luggage; travel luggage; purses; pocket wallets; travelling handbagsACTIVE—
025Apparel, namely, tops and bottoms as clothing; headwear; active wear; beach hats; beach robes; beachwear; belts as clothing; denim jeans; dress shoes; dresses; footwear; footwear for women; gloves as clothing; hats; headbands as clothing; jackets as clothing; jump suits as clothing; lingerie; pants as clothing; playsuits as clothing; robes; scarves; shoes; slips as clothing; swimsuits; swimwear; underwear; wraps as clothingACTIVE—
035retail, online retail, wholesale, and online wholesale store services featuring clothing, eyewear, bags, and jewelry; organisation and conducting of product presentationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 9, 2022FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 21, 2022FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 21, 2022FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 9, 2022OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 22, 2021OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 22, 2021OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 28, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 28, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2021PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Aug 26, 2021PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Aug 20, 2021APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Aug 20, 2021PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 15, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 15, 2021NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2021PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 14, 2021PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2021NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2021PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 8, 2021PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2021MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 16, 2021ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 18, 2020CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 18, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 24, 2020RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 24, 2020RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 23, 2020RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 22, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 21, 2020MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 17, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 16, 2020REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance