USPTO serial 79289554
Serial No. 79289554
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ASKEW, MEGAN RUTH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 79289554?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant services; café services; motel services; hotel services; snack-bar services; food and drink catering; rental of meeting rooms | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 17, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 28, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 23, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2020 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |