USPTO serial 79289793
JCAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOLODNER, LOUIS FRANCIS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JCAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROGER H. BORA
Roger H. Bora Thompson Hine LLP10050 Innovation Drive, Suite 400Austin Landing, Discovery Place Bldg.Dayton, OH 45342Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Recorded software for quantity surveying, quantity calculations as well as cost calculations for determining the quantity and costs of construction materials for construction projects in the construction industry; recorded software for making, interpreting, monitoring and utilizing quantity and cost calculations for determining the quantity and costs of construction materials for construction projects in the construction industry, including the HPAC and electricity sector | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer software in the field of quantity surveying, quantity calculations as well as cost calculations for determining the quantity and costs of construction materials for construction projects in the construction industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 9, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 6, 2023 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 6, 2023 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 26, 2022 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 8, 2022 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2022 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2022 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 1, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2022 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 1, 2022 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 7, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 9, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 17, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |