Drawing for STUUL

USPTO serial 79290051

STUUL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STUUL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHELLE GALLAGHER

MICHELLE GALLAGHER WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN & DICKER LLP260 Franklin Street, 14th FloorBoston, MA 02110UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010furniture especially made for medical purposesACTIVE—
020ladders and movable steps, non- metallic; furniture of plastic material for bathrooms; modular bathroom furniture; mobile pedestals being furniture; furniture for use in rest rooms; stackable furnitureACTIVE—
035Commercial information and advice services for consumers in the choice of products and services in the field of furniture especially made for medical purposes, ladders and movable steps, furniture of plastic material for bathrooms, modular bathroom furniture, mobile pedestals, furniture for use in rest rooms, stackable furniture; retail store and wholesale store services, including online and mail order services, in relation to furniture especially made for medical purposes; retail store and wholesale store services, including online and mail order services, in relation to ladders and movable steps, furniture of plastic material for bathrooms, modular bathroom furniture, mobile pedestals, furniture for use in rest rooms, stackable furnitureACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 26, 2023FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 6, 2023FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2023FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 6, 2022MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 6, 2022ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 5, 2022EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2022OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 5, 2022GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2022GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2022CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Dec 29, 2021OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 29, 2021OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 21, 2021JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 8, 2021RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 7, 2021GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2021GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2021CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Sep 24, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 20, 2021ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2021EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 20, 2021JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 20, 2021EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 19, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 19, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 19, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 4, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 25, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2021ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Feb 25, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 25, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 7, 2020RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 3, 2020RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 30, 2020RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 29, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2020MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 24, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 24, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2020REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance