USPTO serial 79290220
INNVITA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PURATH, ANICKA S
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INNVITA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Pasta; fresh pasta; dried pasta; egg pasta; wholemeal pasta; filled pasta; puff pastry; deep frozen pasta; pasta sauces; pasta-based ready-made dishes; canned pasta foods; pasta salad; preparations made from cereals, namely, breakfast cereals, biscuits, tarts, cakes made with cereals, cereal-based snack foods, bread and pastry | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Beer; extracts of hops for making beer; craft beers; flavored beers; non-alcoholic beer; beer-based cocktails; beer-based beverages; beer wort; imitation beer; sherbets in the nature of beverages; fruit beverages; vegetable-based beverages; energy drinks; part frozen slush drinks; concentrates used in the preparation of soft drinks; fruit juices; vegetable juices in the nature of beverages; syrups for beverages; smoothies; drinking water; soft drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ISEA S.R.L.
- Other trademarks owned by SOCIETA? PRODUTTORI SEMENTI S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by AGROSERVICE S.P.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named INNVITA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2023 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 26, 2023 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 3, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 1, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 31, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2020 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |