USPTO serial 79290435
QUICK GROUP CROSS BORDER RECRUITMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QUICK GROUP CROSS BORDER RECRUITMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Osaka 530-0018, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M. Scott Alprin
M. Scott Alprin Alprin Law Offices, P.C.5 Pinehurst Circle, N.W.Washington, DC 20015UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Personnel placement services; personnel recruitment; employment agency services; consultancy, advisory and information services relating to personnel placement service, employment agency service and personnel recruitment; corporate overseas postings agency service; preliminary research, planning and consultancy or advisory and information services relating to corporate launching overseas operations; consultancy relating to corporate launching overseas operations; consultancy, advisory and information services relating to recruitment, employment and labor management of companies; consultancy, advisory and information services relating to pay system and performance review; business management and consultancy, advisory and information services relating to business management; marketing research or analysis relating to corporate employment status; testing to determine professional and job competency; business management of hotels; business management analysis or business consultancy; marketing research or market analysis and consultancy, advisory and information services relating to marketing research or market analysis; providing information concerning commercial sales; drawing up of statements of accounts; auctioneering; arranging newspaper subscriptions for others; general office services; import-export agency services; document reproduction; shorthand; transcription of communications [office functions]; providing business assistance to others in the operation of data processing apparatus namely, computers, typewriters, telex machines and other similar office machines; office functions, namely, filing in particular documents or magnetic tapes; publicity material rental; rental of typewriters, photocopying machines and word processor; providing recruitment information; rental of vending machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 1, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 12, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 11, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |