Drawing for ZELF

USPTO serial 79290584

ZELF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAYSIDO, REBECCA TOLENTINO
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ZELF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Recorded computer software for use in database management; computer hardware; electronic chips for the manufacture of integrated circuits; eye glassesACTIVE—
038News agencies, namely, the transmission of news items to news reporting organizations; communication by computer terminals; computer aided transmission of messages and images; providing an on-line forum for social networkingACTIVE—
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in database management; computer services, namely, integration of private and public cloud computing environments; computer system designACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 10, 2022FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 22, 2022FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 22, 2022FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2022OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 5, 2022OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 5, 2022OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 22, 2021MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 22, 2021ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 27, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 6, 2020RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 1, 2020RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 11, 2020MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 6, 2020RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 5, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 5, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2020LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2020REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance