USPTO serial 79290622
WARFACE BREAKOUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- XU, ELAINE YILIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WARFACE BREAKOUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs, recorded; computer operating programs, recorded; computer software, recorded; compact discs [audio-video]; interfaces for computers; magnetic data media; monitors [computer programs]; optical data media; electronic notice boards; electronic publications, downloadable; computer programs, downloadable; computer game software, downloadable; downloadable image files; computer software applications, downloadable; compact discs [read-only memory] | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Arcade video game machines; video game machines; games; apparatus for games; portable games with liquid crystal displays; toys; toy mobiles | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services; providing recreation facilities; production of shows; entertainer services; providing amusement arcade services; game services provided online from a computer network; cinema presentations; club services [entertainment or education]; party planning [entertainment]; videotape editing; recording studio services; television entertainment; radio entertainment; rental of videotapes; rental of sound recordings; rental of audio equipment; rental of sports equipment, except vehicles; discotheque services; organization of exhibitions for cultural or educational purposes; organization of sports competitions; providing sports facilities; sport camp services; health club services [health and fitness training]; videotaping; photography; organization of lotteries; providing information relating to recreational activities; providing information in the field of entertainment; film production, other than advertising films; nightclub services [entertainment] | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer programming; computer software design; updating of computer software; installation of computer software; computer system design; computer system analysis; maintenance of computer software; recovery of computer data; computer rental; rental of computer software; creating and maintaining web sites for others; duplication of computer programs; consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware; conversion of computer programs and data, other than physical conversion | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 9, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 8, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2020 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |