USPTO serial 79290740
MORANGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VO, JULIE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MORANGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOE MCKINNEY MUNCY
JOE MCKINNEY MUNCY MUNCY, GEISSLER, OLDS & LOWE, P.C.4000 LEGATO ROAD SUITE 310FAIRFAX, VA 22033UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable mobile applications for use in database management; combination video players and recorders; cameras; cameras for photography; monitoring apparatus, namely, battery performance monitors, other than for medical purposes; camcorders; devices for recording sound and image carriers; video monitors; electric and electronic video surveillance installations; computer monitors | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2021 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 29, 2021 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 29, 2021 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 29, 2021 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 24, 2021 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2021 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 30, 2021 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2021 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Dec 2, 2020 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 11, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 9, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 11, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 10, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |