USPTO serial 79290815
OPTIMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLAZICH, JOAN MICHELE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OPTIMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia I. Reding
Patricia I. Reding Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP90 South Seventh Street, Suite 2200Minneapolis, MN 55402-3901UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Demountable and configurable partitioning and demountable and configurable partitions comprising non-load bearing interior walls being wholly or principally metallic; demountable and configurable partitioning and demountable and configurable partitions comprising non-load bearing interior walls being wholly or principally metallic and containing decorative glass inserts or decorative fabric-covered panels used to create meeting rooms, workspaces, barriers and other structures to demark space, all of the foregoing being for use in offices | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Demountable and configurable partitioning and demountable and configurable partitions comprising non-load bearing interior walls being wholly or principally non-metallic; demountable and configurable partitioning and demountable and configurable partitions comprising non-load bearing interior walls being wholly or principally non-metallic and containing decorative glass inserts or decorative fabric-covered panels used to create meeting rooms, workspaces, barriers and other structures to demark space, all of the foregoing being for use in offices | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Furniture, screens, filing cabinets; door fittings and shelving, all being wholly or principally non-metallic; all being for use in offices | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Construction in the nature of installation in offices of demountable and configurable partitioning, construction in the nature of installation in offices of demountable and configurable partitioning comprising non-load bearing interior walls, construction in the nature of installation in offices of demountable and configurable partitioning comprising non-load bearing interior walls containing glass inserts or decorative fabric covered panels, all of the foregoing being used to create meeting rooms, workspaces, barriers and other structures to demark space; construction in the nature of installation in offices of demountable and configurable partitions, construction in the nature of installation in offices of demountable and configurable partitions comprising non-load bearing interior walls, construction in the nature of installation in offices of demountable and configurable partitions comprising non-load bearing interior walls containing glass inserts or decorative fabric covered panels, all of the foregoing being used to create meeting rooms, workspaces, barriers and other structures to demark space | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 28, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 28, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 28, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 11, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 10, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 10, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 20, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 19, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2020 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |