USPTO serial 79290921
KWETCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KWETCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat extracts; preserved, frozen, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jams, compotes; butter, oils and fats for food; hummus; fruit purée; fruit jellies; fruit and vegetable puree; fruit compotes; garlic-based spreads; cheese spread; hazelnut spreads; fruit-based spreads; meat-based spreads; spreads based on dairy products; nut-based spreads; hazelnut spreads; vegetable-based spreads; fat-containing mixtures for bread slices; marmalades; jams; ginger jam; jellies, jams, compotes; jellies, fruit compotes; apple purée | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Mayonnaises; mustard; table syrup; starch syrup for culinary use; topping syrups; pancake syrup; chocolate syrups; golden syrup; molasses syrup for culinary use; corn syrup for culinary use; topping syrups; maple syrup; agave syrup (natural sweetener); chocolate; ice cream, sherbets and other edible ices; honey, treacle; seasonings, spices, herbs being preserved; ice for refreshment; chocolate spreads containing nuts; chocolate-based spreads; chocolate desserts; salad dressings; vinegar, sauces and other condiments; vinegar, sauces (condiments); cranberry sauce (condiment); ketchup (sauce); sauces (condiments); tomato sauce; jam buns | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Syrups for lemonade; concentrates, syrups and powders for preparing non-alcoholic beverages; fruit squashes; syrups and other preparations without alcohol for making beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 10, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2020 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 12, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 11, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |