USPTO serial 79291113
PROMICELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CIANCI, RYAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROMICELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ELIZABETH LEE D'AMORE
ELIZABETH LEE D'AMORE LUCAS & MERCANTI, LLP30 BROAD STREET21ST FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Vermin repelling preparations; biological herbicides; fungicides; biological fungicides; biopesticides; biological microbicides for industrial and institutional manufacturing processes and wastewater applications; all the aforesaid goods for use in agriculture and horticulture and not for use with mushrooms | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2023 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 12, 2023 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 12, 2023 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 12, 2023 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 27, 2022 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2022 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 3, 2022 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2022 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jul 25, 2022 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jul 22, 2022 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 15, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2022 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 30, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2022 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2022 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 29, 2022 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Mar 2, 2022 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Jan 29, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 31, 2021 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2021 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 26, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 19, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 1, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |