USPTO serial 79291970
FRIENDS VR WORLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CIANCI, RYAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FRIENDS VR WORLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SANG HO LEE
SANG HO LEE NOVICK, KIM & LEE, PLLC3251 OLD LEE HIGHWAYSUITE 500FAIRFAX, VA 22030Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | 3D spectacles; downloadable virtual reality game software; headsets for virtual reality games; virtual reality goggles; downloadable smart phone application software featuring virtual reality game software; downloadable computer software programs for operating virtual reality computer games; downloadable tickets for events or venue access; downloadable publications in the nature of e-zines in the field of virtual reality gaming; large LED displays; downloadable animated cartoon strips; smartphones; speaker systems comprised of audio speakers; downloadable electronic music files; electric audio and visual apparatus and instruments, namely, audiovisual receivers, audio-receivers and video-receivers, amplifiers, audio receivers, solid-state video recorders, digital video cameras, portable media players, and portable computers; downloadable augmented reality game software; battery charging cable; computer hardware and computer peripheral devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Provision of information relating to game services; providing online non-downloadable gaming software services; amusement arcade services; arranging and conducting of game events, namely organizing of e-sports competitions; amusement park services; animated films presentations, namely, providing online non-downloadable videos featuring animated cartoons; arranging and conducting of seminars, conferences and exhibitions for cultural or educational purposes in the field of virtual reality gaming; training services relating to e-sports competitions; production of animations; providing classes in the field of animation; providing amusement facilities; providing online electronic publications, not downloadable, in the nature of magazines in the field of virtual reality gaming | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 24, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 24, 2022 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 24, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 9, 2022 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 13, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2022 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2022 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2022 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 26, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 6, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2022 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 6, 2022 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 6, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 6, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 30, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |