USPTO serial 79292041
YOYABA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MESSICK, TABITHA LEE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with YOYABA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Search engine marketing services; consultancy relating to search engine optimisation; advertising, marketing and promotional services; research services relating to advertising; search engine optimization for sales promotion; brand creation services (advertising and promotion); promotion, advertising and marketing of on-line websites; promoting the goods and services of others via computer and communication networks; dissemination of advertising for others via an on-line communications network on the internet; online advertising on a computer network; consultancy regarding advertising communication strategies; consultancy regarding public relations communication strategies; business consultancy and advisory services; strategic business planning; online advertising; on-line advertising and marketing services; consulting services in the field of internet marketing | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Building and maintaining websites; hosting computer sites [web sites]; managing the web sites of others; consultancy with regard to webpage design; design, creation and programming of web pages; rental of computer hardware and computer software; hosting services, software as a service, and rental of software; creation, maintenance and adaptation of software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 26, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 8, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 19, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 18, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |