USPTO serial 79292125
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Non-precious metal non-electric coffee pots; non-precious metal kettles; non-precious metal tea infusers; non-precious metal teapots; non-precious metal coffee pots; non-electric non-precious metal coffee servers; non-electric kettles; non-electric coffee servers; non-electric coffee kettles; non-electric coffee pots; china mugs; ceramic dinnerware; ceramic dishes; glass mugs; beakers (drink container); non-electric coffee drippers for coffee production; non-electric coffee grinders; manual coffee grinders; non-electric coffee filters | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 11, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 28, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 27, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |