Drawing for VAPX

USPTO serial 79292143

VAPX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RENNEKER, CHRISTOPHER JOHN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VAPX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

YONG CHEN

YONG CHEN LIU CHEN & HOFFMAN LLPONE PENN PLAZA SUITE 2508NEW YORK, NY 10119UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
034electronic cigarettes; liquid nicotine solutions for use in electronic cigarettesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2024CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 8, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2024FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 4, 2024FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 4, 2024FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 5, 2023MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 4, 2023ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 4, 2023OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 4, 2023OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Feb 13, 2022OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 28, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 26, 2022OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 26, 2022OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 19, 2021RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 30, 2021OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 24, 2021OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Mar 24, 2021OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Mar 16, 2021ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 27, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 6, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 21, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 5, 2020RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 5, 2020RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 15, 2020RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 14, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 2020MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 26, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2020LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 20, 2020REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance