USPTO serial 79292351
LU-GLOBAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LU-GLOBAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising services; business risk assessment services; providing business information via a web site; business intermediary services relating to the matching of potential private investors with entrepreneurs needing funding; sales promotion for others; provision of an online marketplace for buyers and sellers of goods and services; personnel management consultancy; updating and maintenance of data in computer databases; accounting services; sponsorship search | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Insurance underwriting services for all types of insurance; financial evaluation for insurance purposes; financial evaluation of banking; financial evaluation of real estate; funds investment; financial asset management; capital investment; processing of electronic wallet payments; private equity fund investment services; antique appraisal; real estate agency services; financial customs brokerage services; surety services; charitable fundraising services; fiduciary representatives; pawnbrokerage | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical research in the field of information technology; creating and maintaining web sites for others; design and development of computer software; development of computer platforms; electronic monitoring of credit card activity to detect fraud via the internet; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for producing financial models; providing user authentication services using biometric hardware and software technology for e-commerce transactions; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for producing financial models; design and development of software in the field of mobile applications; computer programming services for commercial analysis and reporting; designing computer software for controlling self-service terminals; developing computer programs for electronic cash register systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 17, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |