Drawing for BIOPAK

USPTO serial 79292405

BIOPAK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PARKS, KIMBERLY L
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIOPAK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory J. Chinlund

Gregory J. Chinlund Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP233 S Wacker Drive6300 Willis TowerChicago, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable augmented reality software for simulation in the field of food packaging servicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2024FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 19, 2024FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 19, 2024FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 20, 2023MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jan 19, 2023ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jan 18, 2023EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2023CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2023COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2023CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 13, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2023COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 14, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2022CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 29, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 29, 2022XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2022GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2022GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2022CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 31, 2022RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 18, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2022OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 2, 2022OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 2, 2022OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 26, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 26, 2021GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2021GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2021CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 25, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 14, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 26, 2020RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 26, 2020RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 4, 2020RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 3, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 2020MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 28, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2020REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance