USPTO serial 79292413
MAVERICK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAVERICK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yael Rouach Cabilly
Yael Rouach Cabilly Cabilly & Co.101 West 67 Streetc/o CabillyNew York, NY 10023Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware, software and peripherals, namely, control-flow processors in the nature of central processing units (CPU) and graphic processing units (GPU), application-specific computer hardware accelerators, peripheral component interface (PCI) accelerator cards, chipsets, semiconductor processors, semiconductor ASICs (application-specific integrated circuits); microprocessors, microcontrollers, electronic circuit boards and computer hardware for high-speed processing; downloadable computer software namely, computer application software and algorithms for computer acceleration and for managing hardware or software components used for processing; all for implementation in various market segments and applications, namely, in data centers, supercomputers, appliances, servers, big data analytics, neural networks, optimization and computation of intensive applications, artificial intelligence and machine learning, network processors, image analysis, cybersecurity, financial trading | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer design, engineering, development implementation and consulting for others in connection with computer hardware and software, namely, control-flow processors in the nature of central processing units (CPU) and graphic processing units (GPU), application-specific hardware accelerators, peripheral component interface (PCI) accelerator cards, semiconductor processors, semiconductor ASICs (application-specific integrated circuits), microprocessors, microcontrollers, electronic circuit boards and other computer hardware for high-speed processing, computer software namely, to computer application software for processing acceleration and for managing hardware or software components used for processing; all the aforementioned services provided in various market segments and applications, namely, big data analytics, neural networks, optimization and computation of intensive applications, artificial intelligence and machine learning, network processors, image analysis, cybersecurity, financial trading | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 19, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 10, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |