USPTO serial 79292455
DIGITAL PEOPLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUTCHISON, DAVID A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIGITAL PEOPLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services, featuring software using artificial intelligence for improving human user access to computer information in the fields of education, healthcare, sales of goods and services, provisions of goods and services, entertainment, sports, office and other workplaces for use as a medium between humans and computers; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms using artificial intelligence for improving human user access to computer information in the fields of education, healthcare, sales of goods and services, provisions of goods and services, entertainment, sports, office and other workplaces for use as a medium between humans and computers; providing online access to an interactive website featuring technology that allows users to engage with a computer network or system to pass or receive information; advanced product research in the field of artificial intelligence; computer programming; computer software development; computer software design; software development in the field of artificial intelligence; software development in the field of computational simulations; consulting services in the field of software as a service (SAAS); consultancy in the design and development of computer software; computer technology consultancy, namely, consulting services in the fields of selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; information technology (IT) consultancy; advisory, consultancy and information services relating to computer software; artificial intelligence consultancy, namely, technology consultation in the field of artificial intelligence; computer software research, namely, research and development of computer software; computer programming, namely, programming of computer character animations; scientific research in the field of psychology; technical research in the field of artificial intelligence for improving human user access to computer information in the fields of education, healthcare, sales of goods and services, provisions of goods and services, entertainment, sports, office and other workplaces; scientific research; scientific research, namely, neuroscience research; scientific research, namely, biological research; artificial intelligence research; scientific research, namely, cognitive science research; graphic arts design; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for animation; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for computer 3d graphics in the field of computer science | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2026 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 3, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2021 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2021 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 2, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 11, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 1, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |