USPTO serial 79292590
POWERED BY KUNPENG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POWERED BY KUNPENG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Chips [integrated circuits]; printed circuits; multiprocessor chips; central processing units [processors]; digital signal processors; graphics processor units [GPUs]; central processing units for processing information, data, sound and images; computer programs [downloadable software]; computer servers; computer memory devices; computer software, recorded; computer hardware; semiconductor memory devices; integrated circuits; integrated circuit cards; network communication equipment; cell phones; smartwatches; humanoid robots with artificial intelligence; tablet computers; batteries, electric; vehicle radios; electronic navigational and positioning apparatus and instruments; radar apparatus; loudspeakers; television apparatus; earphones; virtual reality headsets; wearable video display monitors; set-top boxes; camcorders; sensors | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical research; research and development of new products for others; scientific research; technical project studies; telecommunications technology consultancy; computer programming; computer software design; updating of computer software; consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware; maintenance of computer software; recovery of computer data; conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; computer system design; data conversion of computer programs and data [not physical conversion]; computer software consultancy; rental of web servers; providing search engines for the internet; web site design consultancy; information technology [IT] consultancy; electronic data storage; providing information on computer technology and programming via a web site; cloud computing; computer technology consultancy; computer security consultancy; developing of driver and operating system software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 27, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 21, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |