USPTO serial 79292875
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theodore R. Remaklus
Theodore R. Remaklus Wood, Herron & Evans, L.L.P.600 Vine StreetSuite 2800Cincinnati, OH 45202| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Household or kitchen utensils and containers, namely, sieves, turners, strainers, spatulas and containers for household use, mixing spoons, graters, molds, garlic presses; cups; coffee mugs; beverage glassware; schnapps drinking glasses; bottle openers, electric and non-electric; cocktail stirrers; mugs; glass jars; corkscrews, electric and non-electric; salad bowls; serving platters; paper plates; disposable table plates; saucers; knife rests for the table; menu card holders; toothpick holders; table napkin holders; egg cups; ceramics for household purposes, namely, cups, plates, bowls and ovenware; kitchen containers; salt shakers; cookie jars; tea caddies; boxes for dispensing paper towels for household use; spice sets, namely, spice racks; services, namely, tea services and dishes in the nature of tableware; oil and vinegar sets, namely, cruet sets for oil and vinegar; trivets; earthenware saucepans; teapots; perfume vaporizers sold empty; pots; vases; chamber pots; flower pots; perfume burners; serving trays, namely, cabarets; sugar bowls; soup bowls | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Flour and cereal-products, namely, breakfast cereals and processed cereals, pasta made of cereals, bread made of cereals; snacks, namely, rice cake snacks; fruit cake snacks; snack foods made from corn; snacks manufactured from muesli, namely, muesli bars; cereal-based snack food; rice-based snack food; snack foods consisting principally of pasta; snack foods consisting primarily of rice; flour based savory snacks, namely, grain-based snack food; ready to eat cereal-based snack food; snack foods consisting principally of confectionery made of sugar; snack foods consisting principally of bread; crispbread snacks; snack food made from potato flour; snack food made from cereal flour; snack food made from rice flour; snack bars containing a mixture of primarily grains, and also containing nuts and dried fruit confectionery; ready to eat savory snack foods made from maize meal formed by extrusion; snack food consisting of cereal; confectionery bars, namely cereal bars and cereal based energy bars; muesli bars; confectionery bars, namely, chocolate bars; candy bars; chocolate-coated candy bars; sesame candy bars; filled chocolate bars; snack bars based on wheat; milk chocolate bars; chocolate coated nougat candy bars; cereal based food bars; cereal based energy bars; cereal bars; bakery goods; bread; pasta; gluten-free bread, pasta and bakery goods; wholegrain and multigrain bread, pasta and bakery goods; pies; dried pasta; fresh pasta; pasta containing stuffings; rice; crackers; taralli; thin breadsticks; sponge cake; buns; filled buns; farinaceous food pastes for human consumption; sauces and dressings for for pasta; coffee; artificial coffee; tea; tapioca; sago; treacles; chocolate; cocoa; edible ices; tarts; caramels; sweetmeats being candy; chocolates; honey; puddings; creams, namely, bavarian creams; crème brûlées; crème caramel; chocolate creams, namely, chocolate-based spreads; salad cream, namely, salad dressing; sweet spreads, namely, honey; custards; cocoa based creams in the form of spreads; chocolate spreads; mayonnaise and ketchup-based spreads; ready-made sauces; sauces; mustard; mayonnaise; spices; rice flour; yeast made with or without cereals; canned pasta foods, namely, packaged meals consisting primarily of pasta; tomato sauce; almond paste; pasta sauce; preparations for making sauces, namely, sauce mixes; gravy mixes in granular form; pesto sauce; pizza | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Serving food and drinks; snack-bars services; mobile restaurant services; take-out restaurant services; cafés; cafeterias; restaurants; self-service restaurants; catering for the provision of food and beverages; snack-bars services, namely, fast-food restaurant services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 26, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 26, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 3, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 12, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 27, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2022 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 29, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 19, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 10, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |