USPTO serial 79293074
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas Arno
Thomas Arno Veros Legal Solutions, LLP2305 Historic Decatur Road, Suite 100San Diego, CA 92106UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Alkali metals; compounds of alkali metals; lithium; lithium brine; lithium compounds namely lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium tantalate; lithium concentrates; tantalite and tantalum containing compounds; spodumene; metal oxides; manganese dioxide; alumina and alumina silicates; sodium and sodium salts; chemical additives for use in industry; chemicals for use in batteries; chemicals for use in industry, manufacturing, science, photography, agriculture, horticulture and forestry; industrial chemicals; industrial minerals; minerals for use in batteries; salts for industrial purposes; none of the foregoing being carbon black | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Mining extraction; mining services namely lithium mining; quarrying services; mining of alkali, precious and base metals; mining of lithium | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Treatment and blending of minerals, ores, concentrates and mineral substances; mineral processing services; chemicals and metals extraction and processing; processing of alkali, precious and base metals, including in relation to materials containing these metals and compounds of these metals | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 22, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2021 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 11, 2021 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Jan 15, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 26, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 26, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 15, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 14, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2020 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |