USPTO serial 79293299
ROAD PATROL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, JULIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROAD PATROL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Scientific and technological services; research and design of these services (term considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); design and development of computer hardware and software; cloud data processing (term considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); design of computer software; leasing computer software; analysis of computer system; design of computer systems; computer software consultancy; computer technology consultancy; development and maintenance of third party web sites; development and design of indexing web site information for third parties; digitalization of documentation; electronic data storage; information technology consultancy; installation of computer software; providing information on computer and programming technologies through the web; computer software maintenance; monitoring of computer systems through remote access; monitoring of computer systems to detect problems; monitoring computer systems for detecting unauthorized access or retrieval of data; provision of outsourced services in the field of information technology; provision of software as a service (SaaS); providing online search engines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 22, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 15, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 15, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |