USPTO serial 79293313
STRÖHER BRICK TO CLICK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 31, 2021
- Examiner
- CIANCI, RYAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with STRÖHER BRICK TO CLICK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $325
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart J Bellus
1077 Northern BlvdRoslyn, NY 11576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Non-metallic building materials, namely, clinker cement bricks, bricks, clinker cement brick slips, thin bricks; ceramic wall tiles; ceramic tiles for flooring and lining; ceramic ceiling tiles; ceramic tiles for walls; ceramic tiles for floors; ceramic tiles for ceilings; paving slabs, not of metal; slabs, not of metal, for building; natural stone slabs and tiles; wall linings, not of metal, for building; non-metal composite structures for paving of surfaces, namely, non-metal paving tiles incorporating façade panels, industrially prefabricated with clinker, bricks, clinker brick slips, thin bricks or ceramic with a layer of polyurethane, EPS, mineral wool or other plastics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2026 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2026 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2022 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2022 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 30, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 15, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 10, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 19, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 26, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 21, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 20, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |