USPTO serial 79293675
LYTZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LYTZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Flyer and brochures in the field of real estate sales; fund prospectuses; brochures | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising; marketing services; real estate marketing analysis, namely, development of advertising and marketing concepts, and advertising and marketing for real estate; operation of businesses [for others]; business administration; real estate marketing analysis with regard to financial matters management | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Real estate affairs; real estate management; property portfolio management; property management for condominiums, residential buildings, residential complexes, building complexes a housing management; real estate services; real estate consultancy; real estate consultancy; real-estate valuations; real-estate valuations; real estate agency; arranging letting of real estate; rental of offices [real estate]; rental of accommodation (real estate); real estate selection and acquisition [on behalf of others]; consultancy in the purchasing of real estate; computerised information services relating to real estate; real estate financing; financial affairs; mutual funds; facility management, namely, development of function and usage concepts for real estate with regard to financial matters; financial analysis and consultancy | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 9, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 7, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 7, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 7, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 23, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |