USPTO serial 79293916
SPRINGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIEPEL, CHRISTINA MAXINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPRINGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Transportable buildings of metal; metal hardware and small items of metal hardware, namely, bolts, nuts, screws, brackets, springs, pulleys, and threaded fasteners; other goods of metal, namely, base frames in the nature of frames of metal for conveyor systems and components in the nature of bolts, nuts, screws, brackets, springs, pulleys, rollers, chains, belts, lugs, shafts, arms, pushers, levers, threaded fasteners, and machine belt fasteners for conveyor technology for raw and semi-finished products | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Woodworking machines, namely, machines for manufacturing structural composite lumber and laminated wood for joists; machine tools for cutting raw wood and lumber; motors and engines for conveyor belt assemblies; conveyors being machines and conveyors belts; metalworking machines, namely, machines for milling, grinding bending, cutting, and drilling for use in steel construction and plant engineering in the lumber industry | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Recorded and downloadable scheduling and testing software for use in the lumber industry; recorded and downloadable interactive software for the operation of sawmills and for use in the lumber industry to operate machinery; recorded and downloadable virtual reality software for the operation of sawmills and for use in the lumber industry to operate machinery; recorded machine control software for the operation of sawmills and for use in the lumber industry; material testing instruments and machines for testing the cutting and shaping of wood, and for testing the proper operation of conveyor and cutting instruments for wood; process monitors, namely, downloadable computer software for monitoring sawmills and lumber industry machinery; recorded and downloadable industrial process control software for monitoring and operating sawmills and machines in the lumber industry | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Metalworking for steel construction and installation construction of sawmills and lumber industry machines; custom manufacture of sorting installations for use in the lumber industry; custom manufacture of woodworking machines for use in the lumber industry; custom manufacture of conveyors | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Engineering in relation to machine construction and plant engineering; engineering for designing machines and plants; engineering for analyzing machines and plants and testing the functionality of lumber industry machines and sawmills | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Springer Maschinenfabrik GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SPRINGER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 7, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 7, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 2, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 1, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |