USPTO serial 79294193
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
MC-98000 MONACO, MC
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, footwear, headwear; shirts; clothing of leather or imitation of leather; belts (clothing); furs (clothing); gloves (clothing); scarves; neckties; hosiery; socks; turnovers; slippers; underwear; dressing gowns (robes); suits; trousers; knit bottoms; knitted caps; knitted hats; knitted gloves; knit tops; knit skirts; knit polo shirts; knitted pajamas; knit jackets; knitwear; polo knit tops; mesh underwear; work overalls; work boots; work shoes; work overalls | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 23, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 14, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 13, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2020 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |