USPTO serial 79294544
PAN DACOM DIREKT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROACH, APRIL K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PAN DACOM DIREKT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
63303 Dreieich, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Antennas and aerials as communications apparatus; computer networking and data communications equipment; computer hardware for telecommunications; apparatus for the transmission of data; demultiplexers; metallic cables [electric]; radio wave transmitting aerials; data communications apparatus; data transmission cables; optical waveguides; multiplexers; optical receivers; optical transceivers; optical transmitters; signal amplifiers | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation, maintenance and repair of computer hardware; antenna installation and repair; installation and repair of telecommunications networks; computer hardware and telecommunication apparatus installation, maintenance and repair; repair or maintenance of telecommunication machines and apparatus; repair of telecommunication machines and apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Provision of computing facilities; development of systems for the processing of data; development of systems for the transmission of data; monitoring of computer systems by remote access; research in the field of telecommunications technology | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2020 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 3, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 2, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2020 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |