USPTO serial 79294639
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Devices for wireless radio transmission; digital optical transmission apparatus; electric communication apparatus; electric telecommunications apparatus; electrical transmitters; SIM cards; wearable telecommunication apparatus; wireless transmitters; wireless transmitters and receivers; software; mobile phones; mobile telephones; mobile apps; mobile software; mobile data receivers; mobile apps; software for mobile phones; mobile device management software; computer software for mobile phones; software for mobile device management; software and applications for mobile devices; downloadable applications for use with mobile devices; downloadable mobile applications for the management of data; downloadable mobile applications for the management of information; downloadable mobile applications for the transmission of information; downloadable mobile applications for the transmission of data; computer software to enable the transmission of photographs to mobile telephones; computer programs and software for image processing used for mobile phones; computer software for use on handheld mobile digital electronic devices and other consumer electronics; augmented reality software for use in mobile devices for integrating electronic data with real world environments | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Finance services; personal finance services; computerised banking services; electronic banking services; on-line banking; on-line banking services; providing of banking services; electronic banking; internet banking; banking services in relation to the electronic transfer of funds; banking services relating to the transfer of funds from accounts; card accessed banking services; financial banking services for the deposit of money; financial banking services for the withdrawal of money; information services relating to banking; international banking; personal banking services; personal financial banking services; banking services; electronic banking via a global computer network [internet banking]; electronic debit transactions; financial transactions; monetary transactions; conducting of financial transactions; financial transactions relating to currency swaps; foreign exchange transactions; bank card, credit card, debit card and electronic payment card services; debit account services; processing electronic payments made through prepaid cards; card accessed banking services; ATM banking services; money transfer; currency exchange services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 4, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 3, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 11, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 11, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 10, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2020 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |