USPTO serial 79294891
ARGENTOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ARGENTOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
72458 Albstadt, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines and machine tools for treatment of materials and for manufacturing; cutting, drilling, abrading, sharpening and surface treatment machines and apparatus; tools as parts of machines; cutting tools (mechanically operated tools); milling tools (mechanically operated tools); recessing tools (mechanically driven tools); mechanical tools for machine tools; drilling machines; engines, powertrains, and machine parts, and controls for the operation of machines and engines, namely, chucks, drill chucks, tool holding fixtures, machine tool holders, shrink chucks, extensions for tools, indexable insert, milling chucks and shrink chucks being parts of chip cutting machines, tool setting apparatus for setting and adjusting tools, modular couplings for machine tools; parts and accessories for all the aforesaid goods, included in this class | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 31, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 24, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 31, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 31, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 15, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2020 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 10, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 9, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |