USPTO serial 79294949
SMART VECTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POLLACK, ALISON FRIEDBERG
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMART VECTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal formed parts made by additive manufacturing | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | 3D printers; machines for metal working, namely, machines for processing metal powder by means of electromagnetic radiation or particle radiation | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Software; computer software packages; data processing software; production-assisting software; software for manufacturing technology | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Custom additive manufacturing of formed parts | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Updating of computer software; updating and adapting data processing programs to the requirements of the users; consultancy services relating to computer software for graphics; computer programming and software design; technological planning services; technological design services; engineering services; technical engineering; engineering services for metal forming systems; engineering services relating to data processing; engineering work in data processing; engineering services for the design of constructions; creation and processing of electronic construction drawings and electronic technical drawings; creation and processing of computer files for use with 3D printers and machines for metal processing | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SLM Solutions Group AG
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SMART VECTOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 26, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2021 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 23, 2021 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Feb 13, 2021 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 31, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 30, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |