USPTO serial 79296008
CODEWIZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILLES, DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CODEWIZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | LED modules, other than lighting modules; teaching robots; educational software; downloadable software; downloadable smart phone application; computer programs, downloadable; bluetooth transceiver; smart phone application; application software for smart phone; operating system programs; sonic sensors; circuit boards provided with integrated circuits; integrated circuit module; computer software; computer hardware; computer programs | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Educational toys; metallic toys; fishing tackle; robotic toys; model robots; toy models; blocks (toys); action toys moving based on programs input by users; toy construction sets; infant toys; games and playthings; toy model hobby craft kits; remote-controlled toy vehicles; battery operated action toys featuring music, sound, light and motion; mobile toys; toy robots; plastic toys; toys for education | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 9, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 5, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 4, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |