USPTO serial 79296399
SIGNLIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SIGNLIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Communication by computer; communication by mobile telephone; communication by telephone; communication of information by electronic means; communication of information by television; communication services (electronic -); communication via fibre optical networks; communications by computer; communications by mobile phones; communications by mobile telephones; communications information (provision of -); computer data transmission services; computer network communication services; data communication by electronic mail; data communication services accessible by password; data communications services; data streaming; delivery of digital audio and/or video by telecommunications; delivery of messages by electronic media; electronic communication services; electronic mail; electronic transmission services; fibre optic telecommunications services; interactive telecommunication services; inter-active video text services; internet access services; on-line information services relating to telecommunications; operating chat rooms (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); video communication services; video conferencing; video conferencing services; video messaging services; video teleconferencing; video telephone services; video transmission services; video-on-demand transmission services; videotext services; virtual chatrooms established via text messaging | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 7, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 30, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |