USPTO serial 79297808
SINICARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CIANCI, RYAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SINICARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetic face powders; anti-sun preparations (cosmetics); body creams (cosmetics); cosmetics for animals; cosmetics in the form of creams; cosmetics in the form of gels; cosmetics in the form of non-medicated lotions; cosmetics in the form of oils; essential oils for use in cosmetics; facial wipes impregnated with cosmetics; hair cosmetics; moisturisers (cosmetics); nail revitalising lotions (cosmetics); nail treatment creams (cosmetics); nail treatment gels (cosmetics); nail treatment lotions (non-medicated cosmetics); night creams (cosmetics); nourishing creams (non-medicated cosmetics); oils for the body (cosmetics); oils for the skin (cosmetics); sun creams (cosmetics); sun gel (cosmetics); sun lotions (cosmetics); suntan lotion (cosmetics); suntan oils (cosmetics); tanning creams (cosmetics); tanning oils (cosmetics); tissues impregnated with cosmetics | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Health food supplements for persons with special dietary requirements; health food supplements made principally of minerals; health food supplements made principally of vitamins; antioxidants (dietary supplements); bee glue (propolis) dietary supplements; collagen based medicated supplements; colostrum supplements; dietary nutritional supplements; dietary protein supplements; dietary supplements for animals; dietary supplements for infants; flavonoid substances for use as a dietary supplement; ginseng (dietary supplements); herbal dietary supplements; lecithin dietary supplements; nutritional drinks being dietary food supplements; nutritional supplements for animals; plant extracts (dietary supplements); pollen (dietary supplement); pollen dietary supplements; powdered whey protein being dietary supplements; powdered whey protein being nutritional supplements; propolis dietary supplements; protein dietary supplements; protein supplements for animals; royal jelly (nutritional supplement); royal jelly dietary supplements; whey protein being dietary supplements; whey protein being nutritional supplements | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 3, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 4, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 4, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 5, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 6, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 5, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |