USPTO serial 79298338
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Flight simulators; simulators for the steering and control of vehicles; simulators being apparatus, equipment, and devices for simulating driving, racing, and flying, namely, flight simulators for simulating the operation of aircraft, driving simulators for simulating the steering and control of land and motor vehicles, flight simulators for training personnel in the flying of aircraft, and simulators for training personnel in the steering and driving of land and motor vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2025 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| May 27, 2025 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 6, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 1, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 15, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 25, 2022 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 9, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 9, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 5, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 10, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 26, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 27, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 26, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |