Drawing for THE RIPTIDE SERIES

USPTO serial 79298912

THE RIPTIDE SERIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THE RIPTIDE SERIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Wasco

Michael J. Wasco PAUL FRANK + COLLINS P.C.One Church StreetBurlington, VT 05401UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Submersible pumps with agitator for pumping sludge loaded with solid particles to dewater muddy water in underground mines and open pitsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 12, 2023FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 22, 2023FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 21, 2023FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 14, 2023OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 28, 2022OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 28, 2022OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 23, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 21, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 21, 2022ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 2, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 2, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 2, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 16, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 15, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2021ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 4, 2021CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jul 23, 2021RINXUSPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 23, 2021CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 9, 2021CRSNCORRECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 9, 2021CRCRCORRECTION CREATED FOR IB—
Apr 20, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 20, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2021RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 18, 2021RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 18, 2021RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 18, 2021RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 17, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2020MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 4, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2020REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance