USPTO serial 79299168
VIVOLIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 411
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OAKES, JEFFREY ALLEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIVOLIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katrin Lewertoff
Katrin Lewertoff Ferdinand IP, LLC1221 Post Road EastSuite 302Westport, CT 06880Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Prepared meals consisting primarily of vegetables; prepared meals consisting principally of vegetables; frozen meals consisting primarily of vegetables; frozen prepared meals consisting principally of vegetables | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Demonstration of goods; Providing home shopping services in the field of general consumer merchandise; demonstration of goods for promotional purposes; demonstration of goods for advertising purposes; sales promotion; sales promotion through customer loyalty programs; search engine optimisation for sales promotion; organization, operation and supervision of sales and promotional incentive schemes, namely, sales promotion for others, promoting the sales of goods of others by means of incentive award programs, arranging and conducting incentive reward programs to promote the sale of dietary supplements; all of the aforementioned in relation to dietary supplements, food and drink only; wholesale services in relation to dietary supplements; wholesale services in relation to dietary supplements; retail services in relation to dietary supplements | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2023 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Sep 6, 2023 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Sep 2, 2023 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2023 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2023 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jun 12, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2023 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2023 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2022 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Sep 2, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 20, 2022 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 23, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 4, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2022 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2022 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 13, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 12, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |