USPTO serial 79299265
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Water; aerated water; bottled water; carbonated water; drinking water; flavoured water; glacial water; mineral water; seltzer water; soda water; sparkling water; spring water; still water; table water; tonic water; aerated mineral water; bottled drinking water; carbonated mineral water; coconut water; distilled drinking water; drinking water with vitamins; flavoured mineral water; mineral and aerated water; mineral enriched water; nutritionally fortified water; preparations for making aerated water; sparkling mineral water; powders used in the preparation of coconut water beverages; powders used in the preparation of coconut water drinks; essences for making flavoured mineral water, not in the nature of essential oils; purifying drink water; fruit flavoured water; water-based beverages containing tea extracts | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 4, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 4, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 4, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 13, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 12, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |