USPTO serial 79299299
LEON ENABLING NANO NOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AGREDA, SAMANTHA LEIGH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LEON ENABLING NANO NOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations; chemical preparations for medical purposes; adjuvants for medical purposes; chemical preparations, namely, nanoparticles for pharmaceutical purposes; chemical preparations, namely, nanoparticles for medical purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific research; pharmaceutical research and development services; laboratory research services relating to pharmaceuticals; working on and evaluation of chemical syntheses; pharmaceutical product evaluation; consultancy related to pharmaceutical research and development; product development consultancy in the field of nanotechnology; product development consultancy; industrial product development; conducting clinical trials for pharmaceutical products; materials testing and evaluation; testing, authentication and quality control | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 4, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 24, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 23, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |