USPTO serial 79299369
Serial No. 79299369
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAVIS, MARC STEPHEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 79299369?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beer; beer-based cocktails; ginger beer; malt beer; malt extracts for making liquors; must; grape must, unfermented; beer wort; malt wort; extracts of hops for making beer | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 4, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2021 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 26, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 8, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 7, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2021 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2020 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |