USPTO serial 79299581
KAGEYAMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KAGEYAMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Shark fin soup; mixes for making shark fin soup; mixes for making shark fin soup containing starchy sauce; mixes for making shark fin soup containing fried noodles and starchy sauce; mixes for making shark fin soup containing rice and starchy sauce; mixes for making soup; dishes made mainly of meat or seafood; dishes made mainly of vegetables or fruit; dishes made mainly of beans; dishes made mainly of eggs or processed eggs; ramen soup | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Ramen noodles with ramen soup; uncooked Chinese noodles; steamed buns stuffed with minced meat [chuka-manjuh]; Chinese steamed dumplings [shumai, cooked]; grain processed food using salted chicken white stock; spring rolls; Chinese stuffed dumplings [gyoza, cooked]; stuffed buns [xiaolongbao]; almond jelly [confectionery]; mango pudding; boxed lunches consisting of rice, with added meat, fish or vegetables; dishes made mainly of grain; gruel; boiled rice mixed with meat and other ingredients; cooked rice; noodle-based prepared meals; cooked Chinese fried noodles; ramen noodles | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 043 | Providing foods and beverages | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2023 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2023 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 16, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 30, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 11, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 11, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 24, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 18, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 17, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |