USPTO serial 79299963
SUPREMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 9, 2021
- Examiner
- CIANCI, RYAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with SUPREMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*
Plus Government fees of $975
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathryn E. Smith
Kathryn E. Smith Wood Herron & Evans LLP441 Vine Street2700 Carew TowerCincinnati, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Optical scanners; optical readers; fingerprint identification scanning device for time and attendance management; biometric identification device for time and attendance management; recorded and downloadable computer software for operating identification apparatuses; biochip inspectors; security equipment for face recognition, namely, biometric scanners for fingerprint, facial, and iris recognition; digital door lock apparatus incorporating facial recognition systems; optical reader for recognizing passport fabrication; electric telecommunications apparatus transmitters; electronic fingerprint door locks; fingerprint scanners; fingerprint identification systems comprised of fingerprint scanners for capturing fingerprint images; electronic wire and wireless door locks apparatus for access control; intruder preventing motion sensors; encoded identity cards; door locks for iris recognition | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Constructing an internet platform in the form of online non-downloadable software for visitor identification; electronic monitoring of personally identifying information to detect identity theft via the internet; development of computer software application solutions | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Verification of personal identity as part of personal background investigations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Suprema HQ Inc
- Other trademarks owned by Suprema HQ Inc
- Other trademarks owned by Suprema HQ Inc
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named SUPREMA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2022 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2022 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 24, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2021 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2021 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 2021 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2021 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2021 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2021 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 3, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 2, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |