Drawing for KEBER

USPTO serial 79300238

KEBER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MESSICK, TABITHA LEE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with KEBER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Agricultural machines; disintegrators; packing machines; electric food slicer machines; hydraulic turbines; soldering apparatus, gas-operated; welding machines, electric; shredders [machines] for industrial use; crushing machines; sewage pulverizersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 20, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 22, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Aug 16, 2022FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 25, 2022FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 23, 2022FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 6, 2022OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
May 18, 2022OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 18, 2022OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 23, 2021MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 23, 2021ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 30, 2021RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 9, 2021RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 8, 2021RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Dec 22, 2020RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 22, 2020MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Dec 21, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 18, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 17, 2020REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance