USPTO serial 79300405
DIGITAL CLOUD UTILITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEISECKI, MARK A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIGITAL CLOUD UTILITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software; computer software for providing information relating to data and content; downloadable computer software; electronic machines and apparatus; electronic components | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing computer programs via computer networks; providing computer programs on data networks; software as a service [SaaS]; cloud computing; hosting computer sites; hosting computer sites [web sites]; rental of server memory space for web sites; rental of server memory space; provision of information relating to rental of server memory space; rental of server memory space on the Internet; hosting computer web sites using a cloud computing network; server hosting; rental of computers; computer programming; configuration of computer programs; expansion and addition of functions to computer programs; computer system design; computer programming for computer systems; maintenance of computer systems; research, analysis and consultancy relating to computer system design; research, analysis and consultancy relating to computer programming for computer systems; research, analysis and consultancy relating to maintenance of computer systems; troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software problems [technical support]; troubleshooting of application software problems [technical support]; troubleshooting of networked computer system problems [technical support]; troubleshooting of computer software problems [technical support]; creating manuals for operating computers; creating manuals for using computer programs; technological consultancy relating to operation of computer hardware, software and computer peripherals via helpdesk; installation of computer programs; configuration, installation, fault diagnosis, repair, upgrading and maintenance of computer software; installation, maintenance and repair of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 25, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 25, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 9, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 8, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 24, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |